4.7 Article

Magnetic fields in stellar jets

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 661, Issue 2, Pages 910-918

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/513499

Keywords

hydrodynamics; ISM : Herbig-Haro objects; ISM : jets and outflows; MHD; shock waves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although several lines of evidence suggest that jets from young stars are driven magnetically from accretion disks, existing observations of field strengths in the bow shocks of these flows imply that magnetic fields play only a minor role in the dynamics at these locations. To investigate this apparent discrepancy we performed numerical simulations of expanding magnetized jets with stochastically variable input velocities with the AstroBEAR MHD code. Because the magnetic field B is proportional to the density n within compression and rarefaction regions, the magnetic signal speed drops in rarefactions and increases in the compressed areas of velocity-variable flows. In contrast, B similar to n(0.5) for a steady state conical flow with a toroidal field, so the Alfven speed in that case is constant along the entire jet. The simulations show that the combined effects of shocks, rarefactions, and divergent flow cause magnetic fields to scale with density as an intermediate power 1> p > 0: 5. Because p > 0: 5, the Alfven speed in rarefactions decreases on average as the jet propagates away from the star. Hence, a typical Alfven velocity in the jet close to the star is significantly larger than it is in the rarefactions ahead of bow shocks at larger distances. We find that the observed values of weak fields at large distances are consistent with strong fields required to drive the observed mass loss close to the star. Typical velocity perturbations, which form shocks at large distances, will produce only magnetic waves close to the star. For a typical stellar jet the crossover point inside which velocity perturbations of 30-40 km s(-1) no longer produce shocks is similar to 300 AU from the source.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available