3.8 Article

Confirmation of a BRAF mutation-associated gene expression signature in melanoma

Journal

PIGMENT CELL RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 216-221

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.2007.00375.x

Keywords

BRAF; expression; microarray; mutation; signature; SVM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in the BRAF oncogene occur in the majority of melanomas, leading to the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and the transcription of downstream effectors. As BRAF and its effectors could be good melanoma therapy targets, defining the repertoire of genes that are differentially regulated because of BRAF mutational activation is an important objective. Towards this goal, we and others have attempted to determine whether a BRAF mutation-associated gene expression profile exists. Results have been mixed, with some groups reporting a BRAF-signature and another group not. Here we resolve this issue and confirm that while gene-by-gene correlations fail to reveal a specific gene(s) whose expression correlates with BRAF status, a BRAF signature can be distinguished by analysis of global expression patterns. Specifically, we have here applied support vector machine (SVM) analysis to Affymetrix microarray data from a panel of 63 melanoma cell lines. SVMs found a BRAF signature in training samples and predicted BRAF mutation status with high accuracy (AUC = 0.840) in the remaining samples. We verified this is a generalized BRAF signature by repeating the analysis in three published microarray datasets, and again found that SVMs predicted BRAF mutation well (Philadelphia: AUC = 0.788; Zurich: AUC = 0.688; Mannheim: AUC = 0.686). An ensemble of 300 SVMs trained on our data also predicted BRAF mutation status in two of the three published datasets (Philadelphia AUC = 0.778; Zurich AUC = 0.719; Mannheim AUC = 0.564). Taken together, these data support the existence of a BRAF mutation-specific expression signature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available