4.5 Article

Creatine uptake in brain and skeletal muscle of mice lacking guanidinoacetate methyltransferase assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 6, Pages 2121-2127

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01327.2006

Keywords

energy metabolism; creatine transporter; H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Creatine (Cr) levels in skeletal muscle and brain of a mouse model of Cr deficiency caused by guanidinoacetate methyltransferase absence (GAMT(-/-)) were studied after Cr supplementation with 2 g-kg body wt(-1.)day(-1) Cr for 35 days. Localized H-1 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was performed in brain (cerebellum and thalamus/ hippocampus) and in hind lea muscle of GAMT(-/-) mice before and after Cr supplementation and in control (Con) mice. As expected, a signal for Cr was hardly detectable in MR spectra of GAMT(-/-) mice before Cr supplementation. In the thalamus/hippocampus region of these mice, an increase in N-acetylasparate (NAA) was observed. During Cr administration, Cr levels increased faster in skeletal muscle compared with brain, but this occurred only during the first day of supplementation. Thereafter, Cr levels increased by 0.8 mM/day in all studied locations. After 35 days of Cr supplementation, Cr levels in all locations were higher compared with Con mice on a Cr-free diet and NAA levels nomialized. Only because of the repeated MRS measurements perforrited in this longitudinal Cr supplementation study on GAMT(-/-) mice were we able to discover the initial faster uptake of Cr in skeletal muscle compared with brain, which may represent muscular Cr uptake independent of Cr transporter expression. Our results can provide the basis for additional experiments to optimize Cr supplementation in GAMT deficiency, as increases in brain Cr are slow in patients after Cr supplementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available