4.6 Article

MALDI-ion mobility mass spectrometry of lipids in negative ion mode

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 6, Issue 14, Pages 5001-5007

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay00320a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH [5R44DA030853, 2R44DA036263-02]
  2. NIH SBIR phase II [5R44DA030853, 2R44DA036263-02]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R44DA030853, R44DA036263] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Profiling and imaging using MALDI mass spectrometry (MS) allows detection and localization of biomolecules in tissue, of which lipids are a major component. However, due to the in situ nature of this technique, complexity of tissue and need for a chemical matrix, the recorded signal is complex and can be difficult to assign. Ion mobility adds a dimension that provides coarse shape information, separating isobaric lipids, peptides, and oligonucleotides along distinct familial trend lines before mass analysis. Previous work using MALDI-ion mobility mass spectrometry to analyze and image lipids has been conducted mainly in positive ion mode, although several lipid classes ionize preferentially in negative ion mode. This work highlights recent data acquired in negative ion mode to detect glycerophosphoethanolamines (PEs), glycerophosphoserines (PSs), glycerophosphoglycerols (PGs), glycerolphosphoinositols (PIs), glycerophosphates (PAs), sulfatides (STs), and gangliosides from standard tissue extracts and directly from mouse brain tissue. In particular, this study focused on changes in ion mobility based upon lipid head groups, composition of radyl chain (# of carbons and double bonds), diacyl versus plasmalogen species, and hydroxylation of species. Finally, a MALDI-ion mobility imaging run was conducted in negative ion mode, resulting in the successful ion mapping of several lipid species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available