4.4 Review

Riolan's arch: confusing, misnomer, and obsolete. A literature survey of the connection(s) between the superior and inferior mesenteric arteries

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 193, Issue 6, Pages 742-748

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.022

Keywords

Riolan; arterial circulation of colon; marginal artery of Drummond; colon resection; aorta surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There are 2 interpretations of Riolan's arch: (1) Riolan's arch is identical to a central part of the marginal artery (MA), connecting the superior (SMA) and the inferior mesenteric (IMA) arteries; and (2) Riolan's arch represents a rare artery, connecting the SMA and the IMA. The current review aims to emphasize the clinical importance of the colon's vasculature and to show the feasibility of abolishing the terms Riolan's arch and meandering mesenteric artery. Methods: A literature survey was performed. Results: It appears that no distinct identity can be ascribed to Riolan's arch and that the meandering mesenteric artery represents an angiographically hypertrophied MA and/or the ascending branch of the left colic artery. However, a rare, centrally located, communicating artery has been described. Generally, the MA is sufficient for left colic circulation after ligation of the IMA, but at the splenic flexure, patency of the ascending branch of the left colic artery can be primordial. Conclusion: As connections between the SMA and the IMA can be adequately described using structures mentioned in Terminologica Anatomica, the terms Riolan's arch and meandering mesenteric artery should be abolished. (C) 2007 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available