4.7 Article

Is there a single underlying factor for the 12 metabolic syndrome in adolescents? A confirmatory factor analysis

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 1556-1561

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2481

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - The lack of a universally applicable model for the metabolic syndrome in the pediatric population makes it difficult to define this syndrome and compare its prevalence across studies and diverse populations. We sought to assess whether a single underlying factor could represent the metabolic syndrome in adolescents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2002), we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to assess the validity of waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting insulin, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) as potential phenotypic traits for the metabolic syndrome in adolescents aged 12-17 years (n = 1,262). A multiple-group approach was used to test the invariance in factor loadings across sex and race/ethnicity. RESULTS - The estimates of factor loadings for the total sample were 0.76, 0.46, 0.81, and 0.42 for waist circumference, triglycerides, fasting insulin, and SBP, respectively. The goodness-of-fit indexes were adequate for the total sample (comparative fit index, 0.99, standardized root mean square residual, 0.02), Caucasian boys (1.0; 0.01), African-American boys (0.99; 0.03), Mexican-American boys (1.0; 0.01), Mexican-American girls (1.0; 0.01), and Caucasian girls (0.95 0.04) and acceptable for African -American girls (0.94; 0.05). There were no significant differences in factor loadings of the four measured variables between boys and girls and among the three racial or ethnic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS - The metabolic syndrome as a single underlying factor for the four simple phenotypic traits may be plausible in adolescents. The proposed model appears to be generalizable across sex and race/ethnicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available