4.5 Article

Two-parameter model for mass transfer processes between solid matrixes and supercritical fluids:: Analytical solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages 257-266

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2006.10.007

Keywords

analytical solution modelling; supercritical extraction; supercritical adsorption; supercritical impregnation; scale-up; simulation package

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple two-parameter mathematical model with analytical solution applicable for mass transfer processes between solid matrixes and supercritical fluids has been developed. Experimental curves for supercritical extraction of wheat germ (extractors of 10 mL and 100 mL) and supercritical wood impregnation processes (adsorber of I L) have been fitted using this model. Moreover, the model has been applied to scale up a supercritical adsorption process onto activate carbon from a laboratory unit (adsorber 10 mL) to pilot plant scale (adsorber of I L). The proposed model takes into account the equilibrium step (h) and mass transfer from the bulk of the fluid phase to the surface of the solid (kra). The adjusted results have demonstrated that the model is able to fit all available experimental results with reasonable accuracy. Thus, the fitting average error was 1-6% for extraction process, 3-7% for wood impregnation and 7-10% for adsorption scale-up. The proposed model is versatile and suitable to adjust with only two parameters different supercritical mass transfer processes. The analytical solution based on modified Bessel functions is useful and easily implemented using common computer mathematical programs. Furthermore, a friendly Excel user-interface for the simulation of adsorption/desorption processes is provided within the supporting information; the program runs using MATLAB 7.0 as simulation engine. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available