4.6 Article

Microfab-less microfluidic capillary electrophoresis devices

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 1652-1657

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay26392d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. STTN/NASA [NNX12CG20P-1]
  2. University of Texas at San Antonio
  3. National Institutes of Health through the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [1SC3GM081085, 2SC3GM081085]
  4. NASA [104320]
  5. Research Centers at Minority Institutions [G12MD007591]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to conventional benchtop instruments, microfluidic devices possess advantageous characteristics including great portability potential, reduced analysis time (minutes), and relatively inexpensive production, putting them on the forefront of modern analytical chemistry. Fabrication of these devices, however, often involves polymeric materials with less-than-ideal surface properties, specific instrumentation, and cumbersome fabrication procedures. In order to overcome such drawbacks, a new hybrid platform is proposed. The platform is centered on the use of 5 interconnecting microfluidic components that serve as either the injector or reservoirs. These plastic units are interconnected using standard capillary tubing, enabling in-channel detection by a wide variety of standard techniques, including capacitively coupled contactless conductivity detection ((CD)-D-4). Due to the minimum impact on the separation efficiency, the plastic microfluidic components used for the experiments discussed herein were fabricated using an inexpensive engraving tool and standard Plexiglas. The presented approach (named 5(2)-platform) offers a previously unseen versatility, enabling the assembly of the platform within minutes using capillary tubing that differs in length, diameter, or material. The advantages of the proposed design are demonstrated by performing the analysis of inorganic cations by capillary electrophoresis on soil samples from the Atacama Desert.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available