4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Fast estimation of connectivity in fractured reservoirs using percolation theory

Journal

SPE JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 167-178

Publisher

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/94186-PA

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigating the impact of geological uncertainty (i.e., spatial distribution of fractures) on reservoir performance may aid management decisions. The conventional approach to address this is to build a number of possible reservoir models, upscale them, and then run flow simulations. The problem with this approach is that it is computationally very expensive. In this study, we use another approach based on the permeability contrasts that control the flow, called percolation approach. This assumes that the permeability disorder of a rock can be simplified to either permeable or impermeable. The advantage is that by using some universal laws from percolation theory, the effect of the complex geometry which influences the global properties (e.g., connectivity or conductivity) can be easily estimated in a fraction of a second on a spreadsheet. The aim of this contribution is to establish the percolation framework to examine the connectivity of fracture systems at a given finite observation scale in 2D and 3D. In particular, we use numerical simulation to show how the scaling laws of the connectivity derived originally for constant-length isotropic systems can be expanded to cover more realistic cases including fracture systems with anisotropy and fracture-length distribution. Finally, the outcrop data of mineralized fractures exposed on the southern margin of the Bristol Channel Basin was used to show that the predictions from the percolation approach are in agreement with the results calculated from field data but can be obtained very quickly. As a result, this may be used for practical engineering purposes for decision making.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available