Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 1881-1886Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.895836
Keywords
fuzzy; land-cover classification; neural and neuro-fuzzy (NF) classification; remote sensing; wavelet transform (WT)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The objective of this paper is to utilize the extracted features obtained by the wavelet transform (WT) rather than the original multispectral features of remote-sensing images for landcover classification. WT provides the spatial and spectral characteristics of a pixel along with its neighbors, and hence, this can be utilized for an improved classification. Four classifiers, namely, the fuzzy product aggregation reasoning rule (FPARR), fuzzy explicit, multilayered perceptron, and neuro-fuzzy (NF), are used for this purpose. The performance is tested on multispectral real and synthetic images. The performance of original and wavelet-feature (WF)-based methods is compared. The WF-based methods have consistently yielded better results. Biorthogonal3.3 (Bior3.3) wavelet is found to be superior to other wavelets. FPARR.along with the Bior3.3 wavelet outperformed all other methods. Results are evaluated using quantitative indexes like beta and Xie-Beni.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available