4.6 Article

The effect of microstructure on the permeability of metallic foams

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 4372-4383

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0602-x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressure drop was measured across complex and simple structure metallic foams at different velocity ranges using air as working fluid. Darcian and non-Darcian permeability parameters, K and C, were determined by fitting experimental data with widely accepted quadratic model of Hazen-Dupuit-Darcy. Generally, the experimental results are in good agreement with the model. The differences in K and C values between the two types of metallic foams are due to the different microstructure. For the simple structure specimens, permeability K increased whereas non-Darcian permeability C decreased with increasing pore diameter. The effect of pore size on the permeability of complex structure metallic foams seems to be opposite to that observed with the simple structure specimens and to results reported by other researchers on other porous medium. This discrepancy mainly stems from the differences in window concentration in addition to some heterogeneity in the foam that impeded the gas flow on one side of the specimens. The difference in pressure drop observed in the different metallic foams is due to combined effect of K and C. However, for simple structure foams, K and C could be predicted by Ergun-like model using appropriate values for the empirical constants. The permeability K is significantly affected by pore size and porosity. The quadratic term of Hazen-Dupuit-Darcy equation is mainly due to the inertia of the flow and partially to the drag exerted by the microstructure of the metallic foam. For both foams, as the porosity increases, pressure drop decreases and permeability, K, increases. The introduction of the open cross sectional area term enabled better understanding of the permeability of metallic foams with intricate morphologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available