4.6 Article

Direct HPILC analysis of cellulose depolymerisation in ionic liquids

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 5, Issue 13, Pages 3172-3176

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3ay40182k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [21225007]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21225007] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes of average molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of cellulose in a polar ionic liquid (IL) were analysed with high performance liquid chromatography using a polar IL as an eluent (HPILC). 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium methylphosphonate was used as the polar IL. As a model of partly depolymerised cellulose, a mixed sample composed of cellulose and cello-oligosaccharides (glucose, cellobiose, cellotetraose, and cellohexaose) was evaluated to test the resolution of the HPILC. In the resulting chromatograms, the corresponding peaks for each saccharide were found. Hydrolysed cellulose catalysed by a cellulase mixture in water was then prepared and dried. Then, this was dissolved in the polar IL to analyse its molecular weight distribution. The molecular weight distribution changed depending on the enzymatic reaction time. The peak for cellulose was found to decrease with the increase of the peak for cellobiose, and subsequently the peak for cellobiose decreased with the increase of that for glucose. In addition, cellulose oligomers except for cellobiose were scarcely observed, showing the catalytic feature of cellulase. Depolymerisation of cellulose in the polar IL was also carried out using ultrasonication. The peak for cellulose in the HPILC profiles shifted to a higher retention volume side and broadened with the sonication time, strongly suggesting random depolymerisation of cellulose. Thus, HPILC was confirmed to be effective for the dynamic analysis of cellulose depolymerisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available