4.3 Article

Impact of spinal cord injury on self-perceived pre- and postmorbid cognitive, emotional and physical functioning

Journal

SPINAL CORD
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 429-436

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102022

Keywords

spinal cord injuries; rehabilitation; psychology; quality of life; pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Design: Cross-sectional study with repeated measurements. Objectives: To examine the patient's perspective of the impact of spinal cord injury (SCI) on physical, cognitive, emotional function, and quality of life (QOL). Setting: Australia. Methods: A sample of 63 patients with SCI, 32 of whom had recent injuries, and 31 with established injuries were administered the Ru. Neurobehavioral Inventory to examine patients' subjective evaluation of pre-and post-injury functioning. Current happiness levels were also evaluated using the Subjective Happiness Scale. A follow up assessment was performed 6 months later to examine changes over time. Results: A significant difference was found between perception of pre-and postmorbid function on composite Cognitive (t = 5.99, df = 62, P < 0.001), Physical (t = 11.56, df = 62, P < 0.001), and QOL (t = 7.16, df = 62, Po0.001) scales and on several of the Emotional subscales including anxiety, paranoia and suspicion, and substance abuse (P < 0.001). A series of hierarchical regression analyses indicate that post-SCI pain was a signi. cant predictor of: cognitive (R 2 = 0.20, Po0.001); emotional (R 2 = 0.13, P < 0.004); and of QOL (R 2 = 0.22, P < 0.001) functioning. With the exception of a decrease in happiness (P < 0.01), there were no signi. cant changes in any measures over the 6 month time period. Conclusions: There are significant changes in patients' perceptions of physical and cognitive functioning, and of QOL before and after SCI and some aspects of emotional functioning. Pain has a significant adverse e. ect on functioning. Happiness decreased slightly in the 6 months between surveys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available