Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 137-144Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-007-0042-9
Keywords
BRCA1; MRI; mammography; surveillance; cost-utility
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Recent evidence has investigated the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in younger women with a BRCA1 mutation. However, this evidence has not been contrasted with existing cost-effectiveness standards to determine whether screening is appropriate, given limited societal resources. We constructed a Markov model investigating surveillance tools (mammography, MRI, both in parallel) under a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. The key benefit of MRI is that increased sensitivity leads to early detection, and improved prognosis. For a 30- to 39-year-old cohort, the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of mammography relative to no screening was 5,200 pound. The addition of MRI to this costs 13,486 pound per QALY. For a 40- to 49year-old cohort, the corresponding values were 2,913 pound and 7,781 pound. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the cost-effectiveness of the parallel approach of mammography and MRI. It is necessary to extend this analysis beyond BRCA1 carriers within this age group, and also to other age groups.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available