4.2 Article

The 19-bp deletion polymorphism in intron-1 of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) may decrease rather than increase risk for spina bifida in the Irish population

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 143A, Issue 11, Pages 1174-1180

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31725

Keywords

neural tube defects; spina bifida; dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR); maternal risk; folate polymorphisms; deletion; gene expression; mRNA

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Periconceptional maternal folic acid supplementation can prevent tip to 70% of pregnancies affected with neural tube defects (NTDs), including spina bifida. This has focused attention on folate-related genes such as dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) in a bid to identify the genetic factors that influence NTD risk through either the fetal or maternal genotype. We considered a novel intronic 19-bp deletion polymorphism and two polymorphisms within the 3' untranslated region (721A > T and 829C > T) of the DHFR gene as candidates for NTD risk. We studied NTD cases (n = 283), mothers of cases (n = 280), fathers of cases (n = 279), and controls (n = 256). We did not find the DHFR 829C > T polymorphism to be variable within the Irish population. The 19-bp intron deletion and the 721A > T polymorphisms were found to be in linkage disequilibrium. In contrast to a previous study, the 19-bp intron deletion allele did show a significant protective effect in mothers of NTD cases when present in one (relative risk 0.59 [95%CI: 0.39-0-89], P= 0.01) or two copies (relative risk 0.52 [95%CI: 0.32-0.86], P=0.01). Analysis of mRNA levels revealed a small increase in expression (similar to 1.5-fold) associated with the 19-bp intron deletion polymorphism, but this was not significant. In conclusion, the DHFR intron 19-bp deletion allele may be a protective NTD genetic factor by increasing DHFR mRNA levels in pregnant women. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available