4.6 Article

Low-level determination of six arsenic species in urine by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS)

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 1122-1129

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0ay00601g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [RO-1 CA96002-10]
  2. Comprehensive Minority Biomedical Branch of the National Cancer Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many methods that have been used to speciate arsenic metabolites in urine are unable to adequately resolve the chromatographic peaks for arsenite (As[III]) and arsenobetaine (AsB). We present a High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-ICP-MS) method that has been optimized to reliably measure the following six arsenic species in human urine: As[III], arsenate (As[V]), monomethylarsonous acid (MMA[III]), monomethylarsonic acid (MMA[V]), dimethylarsinic acid (DMA[V]) and AsB. The method was evaluated with regards to changes in mobile phase, accuracy and precision. The ability to quantify the six species in a given sample depended on the low detection limits of the method-0.06 mu g L(-1) for AsB, 0.11 mu g L(-1) for As[III], 0.08 mu g L(-1) for DMA[V], 0.12 mu g L(-1) for MMA[V] and 0.15 mu g L(-1) for As[V]. The procedure was used to measure the six arsenic species in urine samples from 387 individuals in southeast Michigan who are chronically exposed to slightly elevated levels of arsenic in their drinking water. The DMA[V] was detected in 99.2% of samples, AsB in 98.2%, MMA[V] in 73.4%, As[III] in 45.0%, and As[V] in 27.1%. No MMA[III] was detected even in samples analyzed within 6 hours after collection. The results raise some doubt as to whether MMA[III] is a significant metabolite in urine of people exposed to arsenic concentrations below 20 mu g L(-1) in their drinking water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available