3.9 Article

Pollen foraging:: learning a complex motor skill by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris)

Journal

NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages 459-464

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-006-0184-0

Keywords

bumble bee; floral morphology; flower handling skills; learning behaviour; pollen collection rate

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/A/S/2003/00469] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) learn the complex motor skills involved in pollen foraging, we observed naive workers foraging on arrays of nectarless poppy flowers (Papaver rhoeas) in a greenhouse. Foraging skills were quantified by measuring the pollen load collected during each foraging bout and relating this to the number of flowers visited and bout duration on two consecutive days. The pollen standing crop (PSC) in each flower decreased drastically from 0530 to 0900 hours. Therefore, we related foraging performance to the changing levels of pollen available (per flower) and found that collection rate increased over the course of four consecutive foraging bouts (comprising between 277 and 354 individual flower visits), suggesting that learning to forage for pollen represents a substantial time investment for individual foragers. The pollen collection rate and size of pollen loads collected at the start of day 2 were markedly lower than at the end of day 1, suggesting that components of pollen foraging behaviour could be subject to imperfect overnight retention. Our results suggest that learning the necessary motor skills to collect pollen effectively from morphologically simple flowers takes three times as many visits as learning how to handle the most morphologically complex flowers to extract nectar, potentially explaining why bees are more specialised in their choice of pollen flowers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available