4.6 Article

Interference-free determination of abscisic acid and gibberellin in plant samples using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence based on oxidation derivatization coupled with second-order calibration methods

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 115-122

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b9ay00048h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20775025, 20435010]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive excitation-emission fluorescence method with a second-order calibration strategy is proposed to simultaneously determine abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) contents in extracts of leaves and buds of ginkgo. The methodology is based oil the alternating normalization-weighed error (ANWE) and the parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) algorithms. which make it possible that the ABA and GA concentration can be attained in extract of plants even in the presence of unknown interference from potential interfering matrix contaminants, introduced during the simple pretreatment procedure. Satisfactory recoveries were obtained although the excitation and emission profiles of the analytes were heavily overlapped with each other and the background in the extracts. The limits of detection obtained For GA and ABA in leaf samples were 9.6 and 6.9 ng mL(-1). respectively, which were in the Concentration range (from hundreds to several ng g(-1)) for GA and ABA in leaves in different periods. Furthermore in order to investigate the performance of the developed method. some statistical parameters and figures of merit of ANWE and PARAFAC are evaluated. The method proposed lights a new avenue to determine quantitatively phytohormones in extracts of plants with a simple pretreatment procedure, and may hold potential to be extended as a promising alternative for more practical applications in plant growth processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available