4.5 Article

Ligand binding mode to duplex and triplex DNA assessed by combining electrospray tandem mass spectrometry and molecular modeling

Journal

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.03.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we report the analysis of seven benzopyridoindole and benzopyridoquinoxaline drugs binding to different duplex DNA and triple helical DNA, using an approach combining electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), and molecular modeling. The ligands were ranked according to the collision energy (CE50) necessary to dissociate 50% of the complex with the duplex or the triplex in tandem MS. To determine the probable ligand binding site and binding mode, molecular modeling was used to calculate relative ligand binding energies in different binding sites and binding modes. For duplex DNA binding, the ligand-DNA interaction energies are roughly correlated with the experimental CE50, with the two benzopyridoindole ligands more tightly bound than the benzopyridoquinoxaline ligands. There is, however, no marked AT versus GC base preference in binding, as Supported both by the ESI-MS and the calculated ligand binding energies. Product ion spectra of the complexes with triplex DNA show only loss of neutral ligand for the benzopyridoquinoxalines, and loss of the third strand for the benzopyridoindoles, the ligand remaining on the duplex part. This indicates a higher binding energy of the benzopyridoindoles, and also shows that the ligands interact with the triplex via the duplex. The ranking of the ligand interaction energies compared with the CE50 values obtained by MS/MS on the complexes with the triplex clearly indicates that the ligands intercalate via the minor groove of the Watson-Crick duplex. Regarding triplex versus duplex selectivity, our experiments have demonstrated that the most selective drugs for triplex share the same heteroaromatic core.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available