4.7 Article

Foliar and root Cu supply affect differently Fe- and Zn-uptake and photosynthetic activity in soybean plants

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 145-150

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.09.005

Keywords

copper; cell suspension; iron; plant; photosynthesis; soybean; uptake; zinc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparative study on the effect of excess copper (Cu) supplied through leaves and root treatments in soybean plants is presented. Although Cu was accumulated in leaves upon both treatments, important differences were observed between Cu treatment of leaves and Cu supplementation in hydroponic medium. The application of 50 mu M CuSO4 on leaves increased chlorophyll content, oxygen evolution activity of thylakoids and fluorescence emission at 685 and 695 nm with respect to emission at 735 nm compared with control plants. In contrast, soybean plants grown in hydroponic medium supplemented with 50 mu M CuSO4 exhibited lower chlorophyll content, decreased oxygen evolution activity of thylakoids and decreased fluorescence emission at 685 and 695 nm compared with control plants. On the other hand, the elemental analysis of leaves showed differences between the two treatments investigated. The results indicated that no antagonist interaction between Cu- and Fe-uptake took place in plants where excess Cu was applied on leaves but Cu compete with Fe-uptake in plants grown with excess Cu in the hydroponic medium. Furthermore, differences in Zn-uptake were also observed. Zn content decreased upon Cu treatment of leaves whereas the opposite was observed upon Cu treatment through roots. Interestingly, plants with Cu-treated leaves behaved similarly as cell suspensions grown in the presence of excess Cu. The results strongly indicate that different Cu-uptake and transport pathways must operate in leaf cells compared with root cells. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available