4.6 Article

A novel functional CTL avidity/activity compartmentalization to the site of mucosal immunization contributes to protection of macaques against simian/human immunodeficiency viral depletion of mucosal CD4+ T cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 11, Pages 7211-7221

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7211

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of high-avidity CTLs in the right compartment can greatly affect clearance of a virus infection (for example, AIDS viral infection of and dissemination from mucosa). Comparing mucosal vs systemic immunization, we observed a novel compartmentalization of CTL avidity and proportion of functionally active Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells to tissues proximal to sites of immunization. Whereas both s.c. and intrarectal routes of immunization induced tetramer(+) cells in the spleen and gut, the mucosal vaccine induced a higher percentage of functioning IFN-gamma(+) Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells in the gut mucosa in mice. Translating to the CD8(+) CTL avidity distribution in rhesus macaques, intrarectal vaccination induced more high-avidity mucosal CTL than s.c. vaccination and protection of mucosal CD4(+) T cells from AIDS viral depletion, whereas systemic immunization induced higher avidity IFN-gamma-secreting cells in the draining lymph nodes but no protection of mucosal CD4(+) T cells, after mucosal challenge with pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus. Mucosal CD4(+) T cell loss is an early critical step in AIDS pathogenesis. The preservation of CD4(+) T cells in colonic lamina propria and the reduction of virus in the intestine correlated better with high-avidity mucosal CTL induced by the mucosal AIDS vaccine. This preferential localization of high-avidity CTL may explain previous differences in vaccination results and may guide future vaccination strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available