4.6 Article

Four-year results of a prospective-controlled clinical study evaluating healing of intra-bony defects following treatment with an enamel matrix protein derivative alone or combined with a bioactive glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 507-513

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01084.x

Keywords

bioactive glass; controlled clinical study; enamel matrix protein derivative; long-term results; regenerative periodontal therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To evaluate the 4-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery at intra-bony defects with either a combination of an enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) and a bioactive glass (BG) or with EMD alone. Methods: Twenty-five patients with one deep intra-bony defect each were randomly treated with either an EMD+BG (test) or with EMD alone (control). Measurements were recorded at baseline, at 1 and at 4 years following therapy. The primary outcome variable was the clinical attachment level (CAL). Results: The test group demonstrated a mean CAL change from 10.3 +/- 1.6 to 6.7 +/- 1.2 mm (p < 0.001) and to 6.9 +/- 1.0 mm (p < 0.001) at 1 and 4 years, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the 1- and 4-year results. The control group showed a mean CAL change from 10.4 +/- 1.6 to 6.7 +/- 1.1 mm (p < 0.001) at 1 year and 7.0 +/- 0.9 mm (p < 0.001) at 4 years. The CAL change between 1 and 4 years did not present statistically significant differences. In each of the two groups, four defects have lost 1 mm of the CAL gained at 1 year. A CAL gain of 1 mm compared with the 1-year results was measured in only one defect of the test group. Compared with baseline, a CAL gain of >= 3 mm was found at 4 years in 10 defects in both groups. Between the treatment groups, no statistically significant differences in any of the investigated parameters were observed at 1 and at 4 years. Conclusions: Within their limits, the present results indicate that the clinical improvements obtained with both regenerative modalities can be maintained over a period of 4 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available