4.4 Article

Voltammetric Determination of Nitronaphthalenes at a Silver Solid Amalgam Electrode

Journal

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
Volume 42, Issue 15, Pages 2339-2363

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032710903142442

Keywords

Cyclic voltammetry; differential pulse voltammetry; elimination voltammetry with linear scan; 1-nitronaphthalene; 2-nitronaphthalene; silver solid amalgam electrode; solid phase extraction

Funding

  1. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LC 06035, MSM 0021620857]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [203/07/1195]
  3. Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [IAA400400806]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrodes based on amalgam materials were re-introduced in electroanalytical chemistry in the year 2000, partially as reaction to unsubstantiated public fears of liquid mercury. In this publication, the voltammetric behavior of 1-nitronaphthalene and 2-nitronaphthalene was investigated at a mercury meniscus-modified silver solid amalgam electrode. The reduction mechanism in mixed neutral buffer-methanol medium includes the four-electron reduction to hydroxylaminoderivative followed by a two-electron reduction to the amine in acidic medium, similarly to mercury electrodes. In alkaline media, both compounds show the splitting of the main four-electron reduction peak typical for mercury electrodes in two new ones, the first one corresponding to a one electron reduction of the nitroderivative to the nitro radical anion, which was confirmed by microcoulometry. Using optimized conditions (differential pulse voltammetry, Britton-Robinson buffer pH 7.0 - methanol (9:1) medium) the calibration dependences are linear in the range of 2 center dot 10-7 (4 center dot 10-7) to 1 center dot 10-4mol L-1 for 1-nitronaphthalene (2-nitronaphthalene). After preconcentration of the analytes from drinking and river water samples using solid phase extraction the limit of determination was lowered to 3 center dot 10-8mol L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available