4.4 Article

Discovery, synthesis, and structure activity of a highly selective α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 22, Pages 6628-6638

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi7004202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA012242, DA12242] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM048677-160012, GM 48677, P01 GM048677] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH053631, MH 53631, R01 MH053631-12] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) that contain an alpha 7 subunit are widely distributed in neuronal and nonneuronal tissue. These receptors are implicated in the release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate and in functions ranging from thought processing to inflammation. Currently available ligands for alpha 7 nAChRs have substantial affinity for one or more other nAChR subtypes, including those with an alpha 1, alpha 3, alpha 6, and/or alpha 9 subunit. An alpha-conotoxin gene was cloned from Conus arenatus. Predicted peptides were synthesized and found to potently block alpha 3-, alpha 6-, and alpha 7-containing nAChRs. Structure-activity information regarding conotoxins from distantly related Conus species was employed to modify the C. arenatus derived toxin into a novel, highly selective alpha 7 nAChR antagonist. This ligand, alpha-CtxArIB[V11L,V16D], has low nanomolar affinity for rat alpha 7 homomers expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, and antagonism is slowly reversible. Kinetic analysis provided insight into the mechanism of antagonism. alpha-CtxArIB interacts with five ligand binding sites per alpha 7 receptor, and occupation of a single site is sufficient to block function. The peptide was also shown to be highly selective in competition binding assays in rat brain membranes. alpha-CtxArIB[V11L,V16D] is the most selective ligand yet reported for alpha 7 nAChRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available