4.7 Article

The relationship between blood flow and neuronal activity in the rodent olfactory bulb

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 24, Pages 6452-6460

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3141-06.2007

Keywords

two-photon microscopy; olfactory bulb; neurovascular coupling; field potential; mitral cell; blood flow

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the brain, neuronal activation triggers an increase in cerebral blood flow ( CBF). Here, we use two animal models and several techniques ( two-photon imaging of CBF and neuronal calcium dynamics, intracellular and extracellular recordings, local pharmacology) to analyze the relationship between neuronal activity and local CBF during odor stimulation in the rodent olfactory bulb. Application of glutamate receptor antagonists or tetrodotoxin directly into single rat olfactory glomeruli blocked postsynaptic responses but did not affect the local odor-evoked CBF increases. This suggests that in our experimental conditions, odor always activates more than one glomerulus and that silencing one of a few clustered glomeruli does not affect the vascular response. To block synaptic transmission more widely, we then superfused glutamate antagonists over the surface of the olfactory bulb in transgenic G-CaMP2 mice. This was for two reasons: ( 1) mice have a thin olfactory nerve layer compared to rats and this will favor drug access to the glomerular layer, and ( 2) transgenic G-CaMP2 mice express the fluorescent calcium sensor protein G-CaMP2 in mitral cells. In G-CaMP2 mice, odor-evoked, odor-specific, and concentration-dependent calcium increases in glomeruli. Superfusion of glutamate receptor antagonists blocked odor-evoked postsynaptic calcium signals and CBF responses. We conclude that activation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors and rises in dendritic calcium are major steps for neurovascular coupling in olfactory bulb glomeruli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available