4.6 Article

A Three Stage Integrative Pathway Search (TIPS©) framework to identify toxicity relevant genes and pathways

Journal

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM079688, 1R01GM079688-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The ability to obtain profiles of gene expressions, proteins and metabolites with the advent of high throughput technologies has advanced the study of pathway and network reconstruction. Genome-wide network reconstruction requires either interaction measurements or large amount of perturbation data, often not available for mammalian cell systems. To overcome these shortcomings, we developed a Three Stage Integrative Pathway Search (TIPS (c)) approach to reconstruct context-specific active pathways involved in conferring a specific phenotype, from limited amount of perturbation data. The approach was tested on human liver cells to identify pathways that confer cytotoxicity. Results: This paper presents a systems approach that integrates gene expression and cytotoxicity profiles to identify a network of pathways involved in free fatty acid (FFA) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) induced cytotoxicity in human hepatoblastoma cells (HepG2/C3A). Cytotoxicity relevant genes were first identified and then used to reconstruct a network using Bayesian network (BN) analysis. BN inference was used subsequently to predict the effects of perturbing a gene on the other genes in the network and on the cytotoxicity. These predictions were subsequently confirmed through the published literature and further experiments. Conclusion: The TIPS (c) approach is able to reconstruct active pathways that confer a particular phenotype by integrating gene expression and phenotypic profiles. A web-based version of TIPS (c) that performs the analysis described herein can be accessed at http://www.egr.msu.edu/tips.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available