4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Capillary loss precedes the cognitive impairment induced by fractionated whole-brain irradiation: A potential rat model of vascular dementia

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 257, Issue 1-2, Pages 67-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.014

Keywords

capillary loss; dementia; brain irradiation; fractionated dose; rat model; cognitive function

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA113321, R01 CA113321, CA82722] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS20618, R01 NS020618] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain tumor patients who are long-term survivors after whole-brain irradiation (WBI) often suffer cognitive impairment, including dementia. Although the pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood, our studies suggest that radiation-induced cognitive impairment may be a form of vascular dementia. We used a fractionated dose of gamma-rays that is biologically similar to that given to brain tumor patients. The brains of adult rats were irradiated with 40 Gy, in eight 5 Gy fractions over 4 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed prior to WBI and up to 9 months post-irradiation using a partially-baited radial arm maze. A significant increase in working memory errors was found in the irradiated rats by two-way ANOVA (p=0.0042). The increased errors occurred primarily at 6 and 9 months (p < 0.05, student's t-test)Vessel density was quantified using a stereology method with computerized image processing and analysis. Vessel density was unchanged 24 It after the last dose, but significantly decreased (p=0.002), by approximately 30%, from 10 weeks to 52 weeks. Thus, cognitive impairment arose after brain capillary loss in irradiated rats that show no other gross brain pathology. Capillary loss may play an important role in radiation-induced dementia and this may be a model of vascular dementia. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available