4.6 Article

C5a-blockade improves burn-induced cardiac dysfunction

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 12, Pages 7902-7910

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7902

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 31963] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 61656, GM 29507, GM 54911] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously reported that generation of the anaphylatoxin C5a is linked to the development of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis due to C5a interaction with its receptor (C5aR) on cardiomyocytes. Burn injury involves inflammatory mechanisms that can lead to C5a generation as well. In this study, we investigated the effects of C5a blockade on burn-induced cardiac dysfunction. Using a standardized rat model of full thickness scald injury, left ventricular pressures were recorded in vivo followed by in vitro assessment of sarcomere contraction of single cardiomyocytes. Left ventricular pressures in vivo and cardiomyocyte sarcomere contractility in vitro were significantly reduced following burn injury. In the presence of anti-C5a Ab, these defects were greatly. attenuated 1, 6, and 12 h after burn injury and completely abolished 24 h after burn. In vitro incubation of cardiomyocytes with bacterial LPS accentuated the impaired contractility, which was partially prevented in cardiomyocytes from burned rats that had received an anti-C5a Ab. Based on Western blot analyses, real-time PCR, and immunostaining of left ventricular heart tissue, there was a significant increase in cardiomyocyte expression of C5aR after burn injury. In conclusion, an in vivo blockade of C5a attenuates burn-induced cardiac dysfunction. Further deterioration of contractility due to the exposure of cardiomyocytes to LPS was partially prevented by C5a-blockade. These results suggest a linkage between C5a and burn-induced cardiac dysfunction and a possible contribution of LPS to these events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available