4.5 Article

Histological and mechanical evaluation of self-setting calcium phosphate cements in a sheep vertebral bone void model

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 81A, Issue 4, Pages 838-846

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31079

Keywords

calcium phosphate cement (CPC); biocompatibility; mechanical properties; spinal surgery

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR 050953] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the histological and compressive properties of three different calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) using a sheep vertebral bone void model. One of the CPCs contained barium sulfate to enhance its radiopacity. Bone voids were surgically created in the lumbar region of 23 ovine spines-L3, L4, and L5 (n = 69 total vertebral bodies)-and the voids were filled with one of the three CPCs. A fourth group consisted of whole intact vertebrae. Histologic evaluation was performed for 30 of the 69 vertebrae 2 or 4 months after surgery along with radiographic evaluation. Compressive testing was performed on 39 vertebrae 4 months after surgery along with micro-CT analysis. All three CPCs were biocompatible and extremely osteoconductive. Osteoclasts associated with adjacent bone formation suggest that each cement can undergo slow resorption and replacement by bone and bone marrow. Compressive testing did not reveal a significant difference in the ultimate strength, ultimate strain, and structural modulus, among the three CPCs and intact whole vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis revealed good osseointegration between all three CPCs and adjacent bone. The barium sulfate did not affect the CPCs biocompatibility or mechanical properties. These results suggest that CPC might be a good alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for selected indications. (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 81A: 838-846, 2007.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available