4.8 Article

Analysis on the Go: Quantitation of Drugs of Abuse in Dried Urine with Digital Microfluidies and Miniature Mass Spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 86, Issue 12, Pages 6121-6129

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac5012969

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation [CHE1307264]
  3. NSERC
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) program
  5. Canada Research Chair (CRC) program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the development of a method coupling microfluidics and a miniature mass spectrometer, applied to quantitation of drugs of abuse in urine. A custom digital microfluidic system was designed to deliver droplets of solvent to dried urine samples and then transport extracted analytes to an array of nanoelectrospray emitters for analysis. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection was performed using a fully autonomous 25 kg instrument. Using the new method, cocaine, benzoylecgonine, and codeine can be quantified from four samples in less than 15 mm from (dried) sample to analysis. The figures of merit for the new method suggest that it is suitable for on-site screening; for example, the limit of quantitation (LOQ) for cocaine is 40 ng/mL, which is compatible with the performance criteria for laboratory analyses established by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. More importantly, the LOQ of the new method is superior to the 300 ng/mL cutoff values used by the only other portable analysis systems we are aware of (relying on immunoassays). This work serves as a proof-of-concept for integration of microfluidics with miniature mass spectrometry. The system is attractive for the quantitation of drugs of abuse from urine and, more generally, may be useful for a wide range of applications that would benefit from portable, quantitative, on-site analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available