4.7 Article

Molecular modeling study for the binding of zonisamide and topiramate to the human mitochondrial carbonic anhydrase isoform VA

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 4152-4158

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2007.03.070

Keywords

carbonic anhydrase; molecular dynamics; anti-obesity drug

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zonisamide and topiramate are two antiepileptic drugs known to induce weight loss in epilepsy patients. These molecules were recently shown to act as carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibitors, being presumed that the weight loss may be due to the inhibition of the mitochondrial isozymes CA VA and CA VB involved in metabolic processes, among which lipid biosynthesis. To better understand the interaction of these compounds with CAs, here, we report a homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations study on their adducts with human carbonic anhydrase VA (hCA VA). According to our results, in both cases the inhibitor sulfamate/sulfonamide moiety participates in the canonical interactions with the catalytic zinc ion, whereas the organic scaffold establishes a large number of van der Waals and polar interactions with the active site cleft. A structural comparison of these complexes with the corresponding homologues with human carbonic anhydrase II (hCA II) provides a rationale to the different affinities measured for these drugs toward hCA VA and hCA II. In particular, our data suggest that a narrower active site cleft, together with a different hydrogen bond network arrangement of hCA VA compared to hCA II, may account for the different Kd values of zonisamide and topiramate toward these physiologically relevant hCA isoforms. These results provide useful insights for future design of more isozyme-selective hCA inhibitors with potential use as anti-obesity drugs possessing a novel mechanism of action. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available