4.4 Article

Effect of Simvastatin (80 mg) on coronary and abdominal aortic arterial calcium (from the coronary artery calcification treatment with Zocor [CATZ] study)

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages 1714-1717

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.060

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We tested the hypothesis that, compared with placebo, simvastatin would reduce the progression of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and abdominal aortic calcium (AAC) levels in participants asymptomatic for vascular disease. Total CAC and AAC were measured with multidetector cardiac computed tomography. Inclusion criteria were a CAC score of >= 50 Agatston units, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level <= 50 mg/dl, lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level between 100 and 160 mg/dl, and >= 2 other risk factors. Diabetes and history of vascular disease were exclusion criteria. Participants were randomized to receive 80 mg simvastatin (n = 40) or matching placebo (n = 40) for 12 months. Lipids were measured at 3-month intervals, and CAC and AAC measurements were repeated at 6 and 12 months. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL decreased significantly with simvastatin treatment (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons, adjusted for baseline levels), whereas lipids remained unchanged for subjects randomized to receive placebo. Total CAC volume increased from baseline in both treatment groups. For subjects in the active treatment group, CAC volume increased by 9%, whereas in the placebo group, plaque volume increased by 5% (p = 0.12 for treatment effect). AAC volume also increased in both treatment groups (p = 0.15 for treatment effect). In conclusion, simvastatin treatment does not reduce progression of CAC or AAC compared with placebo. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available