4.4 Article

The role of compartment penetration in PI-monotherapy: the atazanavir-ritonavir monomaintenance (ATARITMO) trial

Journal

AIDS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1309-1315

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32814e6b1c

Keywords

protease inhibitor; monotherapy; HIV; atazanavir; cerebrospinal fluid; semen; HIV RNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To limit exposure to anti-HIV drugs and minimize risk of long-term side effects, studies have looked at the possibility of simplified maintenance strategies. Ritonavir-boosted protease-inhibitor (Pl)-monotherapies are an attractive alternative, but limited compartmental penetration of PI remains a concern. Design: Non-comparative 24-week pilot study. Method: Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) monotherapy administered to fully suppressed patients (> 3 month HIV RNA < 50copies/ml). Plasma was obtained every 4 weeks and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and semen at W24. Results: Two patients (7%) failed ATV/r monotherapy. One patient was subsequently identified as a protocol violator since he had a previous history of treatment failure under inclinavir. The second patient deliberately decided to stop treatment after W20. Excluding failing patients, individual measurements of HIV RNA in patients having occasional viral 'blips' was found in five patients. At W24, 3/20 patients had elevated viral loads in CSF (HIV RNA > 100 copies/ml), and 2/15 in semen, despite viral suppression in plasma (< 50 copies/ml). Samples with elevated HIV RNA (> 500 copies/ml) in CSF were all wild type. The mean ATV drug concentration ratio (CSF/blood, n=22) was 0.9%. Indicators of altered immune activation (CD8CD38 C-reactive protein) remained unchanged. Conclusion: This study supports previous results indicating the potential use of PI-based mono-maintenance therapies. However, our results in CSF cautions against the uncontrolled use of PI-based monotherapies. (c) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available