4.4 Article

CCR5 density levels on primary CD4 T cells impact the replication and Enfuvirtide susceptibility of R5 HIV-1

Journal

AIDS
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages 1317-1322

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32815278ea

Keywords

antiretroviral therapy; fusion inhibitors; Enfuvirtide; CCR5; coreceptor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective and design: Studies in cell lines have demonstrated that CCR5 coreceptor levels influence the replication efficiency and Enfuvirticle (T-20) susceptibility of R5 HIV-1 strains. At present, however, the role that CCR5 levels on primary CD4 T cells - which are markedly lower than in cell lines and vary only similar to fivefold among mostdonors - may play in virus replication levels or susceptibility to T-20 is not known. In the present study we evaluated the impact of differences in CCR5 levels among donor CD4 T cells on the infection efficiency and T-20 susceptibility of R5 HIV-1. Methods: CD4 and CCR5 density levels were determined by Quantitative FACS analysis. Virus infectivity assays were conducted in cell lines and primary cells. Associations between coreceptor density, virus replication and T-20 sensitivity were tested using the Spearman's correlation test. Results: We found a positive correlation (r, 0.55; P = 0.011) between CCR5 density levels on primary CD4 T cells and replication of R5 HIV-1. In cell lines expressing physiologically relevant levels of CD4 and CCR5, T-20 was significantly more potent in cells with low CCR5 levels. In addition, T20 50% inhibitory concentrations for R5 HIV-1 replication varied similar to 100-fold among primary cells from different donors and they were positively correlated with CCR5 density values (r, 0.84; P=0.00004). Conclusions: These results suggest that CCR5 density levels in HIV-1 patients may impact the activity of T-20 against R5 strains and that therapeutic approaches to alter CCR5 density may potentiate T-20. (C) 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available