4.8 Article

Analysis of Free Fatty Acids by Ultraviolet Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry Using Insect Wings as Hydrophobic Sample Substrates

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 86, Issue 21, Pages 10763-10771

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac5020047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation (DFG) [DR416/9-1, DR416/10-1, SFB-1052/B6]
  2. Munster University Medical School [DR511003]
  3. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Munster [Z03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physiologically relevant free fatty acids (FFAs) were analyzed by UV-laser desorption/ionization orthogonal extracting time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LDI-oTOF-MS). Dissected wings from Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies were used as the hydrophobic, laser energy strongly absorbing sample substrates. Using untreated substrates produces predominantly molecular [M (+) K](+) ions of the FFAs, whereas other alkali metal adducts can be generated by treating the wings with the corresponding alkali hydroxide before spotting of analyte. Limits of detection for the positive ion mode were determined for mixtures of isolated FFAs to values in the low 10 pmol range. Specific values depend on chain length and degree of unsaturation. R(2) coefficients for the analysis of saturated FFAs were found to be generally close to 0.98 over about 3 orders of magnitude if an internal standard (15:0 FFA) was added. Semiquantitative analyses of mixtures containing unsaturated FFAs are also possible but require more effort on the calibration strategy. Notably, both saturated and (poly-)unsaturated FFAs are detected sensitively in the presence of relatively high concentrations of other physiologically abundant lipids (phospholipids and triacyclglycerols). This simplifies screening of the FFA composition in crude tissue extracts. This feature is demonstrated by the analysis of a crude liver extract and that of fingermarks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available