4.8 Article

Recombinant Streptavidin Nanopeptamer Anti-Immunocomplex Assay for Noncompetitive Detection of Small Analytes

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 86, Issue 20, Pages 10467-10473

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac503130v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion, Uruguay [FMV 3138 ANII]
  2. Fogarty Center NIH [TW05718]
  3. ANII, Uruguay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Short peptide loops selected from phage libraries can specifically recognize the formation of hapten-antibody immunocomplexes and can thus be used to develop phage anti-immunocomplex assays (PHAIA) for noncompetitive detection of small molecules. In this study, we generated recombinant chimeras by fusing anti-immunocomplex peptides selected from phage libraries to the N- or C-termini of core streptavidin and used them to setup phage-free noncompetitive assays for the herbicide clomazone (MW 240 Da). The best conditions for refolding were optimized by a high throughput screening allowing to obtain tens of mg of purified protein per liter of culture. The noncompetitive assay developed with these chimeras performed with a 50% saturating concentration (SC50) of 2.2 +/- 0.3 ng/mL and limit of detection (LOD) of 0.48 ng/mL. Values that are 13- and 8-fold better that those obtained for the SC50 and LOD of the competitive assay setup with the same antibody. Apart from the first demonstration that recombinant peptide-streptavidin chimeras can be used for sensitive immunodetection of small molecules with a positive readout, this new assay component is a highly standardized reagent with a defined stoichiometry, which can be used in combination with the broad option of existing biotinylated reagents offering a great versatility for the development of conventional immunoassay and biosensors. The utility of the test was demonstrated analyzing the clomazone runoff during the rice growing season in northern Uruguay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available