Journal
BIOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages 275-279Publisher
ROYAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0063
Keywords
molecular dating; Bayesian analysis; calibration; fossil; reptile
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A limiting factor in many molecular dating studies is shortage of reliable calibrations. Current methods for choosing calibrations (e.g. cross-validation) treat them as either correct or incorrect, whereas calibrations probably lie on a continuum from highly accurate to very poor. Bayesian relaxed clock analysis permits inclusion of numerous candidate calibrations as priors: provided most calibrations are reliable, the model appropriate and the data informative, the accuracy of each calibration prior can be evaluated. If a calibration is accurate, then the analysis will support the prior so that the posterior estimate reflects the prior; if a calibration is poor, the posterior will be forced away from the prior. We use this approach to test two fossil dates recently proposed as standard calibrations within vertebrates. The proposed bird-crocodile calibration (approx. 247 Myr ago) appears to be accurate, but the proposed bird-lizard calibration (approx. 255 Myr ago) is substantially too recent.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available