4.7 Article

Tumor growth, angiogenesis and inflammation in mice lacking receptors for platelet activating factor (PAF)

Journal

LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 210-217

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.05.003

Keywords

PAFR-KO mice; tumor; angiogenesis; chemokines; cytokines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tumor growth is associated with angiogenesis and inflammation and the endogenous lipid, platelet activating factor (PAF), is a proinflammatory and pro-angiogenic mediator. We therefore measured tumor growth, angiogenesis and inflammation in normal (WT) mice and those lacking the receptor for PAF, through gene deletion (PAFR-KO). Growth of solid tumors derived from colon 26 cells was not altered but that from Ehrlich cells was markedly (5-fold) increased in the PAFR-KO mice, relative to the WT strain. Angiogenesis, as tumor content of VEGF or hemoglobin, was increased in both tumors from the mutant strain. Inflammation, as neutrophil and macrophage accumulation and chemokine (CXCL2 and CCL2) content of tumors, was decreased or unchanged in the tumors implying an overall decrease in the inflammatory response in the PAFR-KO strain. We also assessed growth of the Ehrlich tumor in its ascites form, after i.p. injection. Here growth (ascites volume) was inhibited by about 30%, but neutrophil and macrophage numbers were increased in the ascites fluid from the PAFR-KO mice. Angiogenesis in the peritoneal wall, which is not invaded by the tumor cells, was increased but leukocyte infiltration decreased in the mutant strain. Our results show, unexpectedly, that tumor-induced angiogenesis was increased in mice lacking response to PAF, from which we infer that in normal (WT) mice, PAF is anti-angiogenic. Further, although growth was still associated with angiogenesis in PAFR-KO mice, growth was not correlated with inflammation (leukocyte accumulation). (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available