4.7 Article

Efficient algorithm for simulating homogeneous turbulent shear flow without remeshing

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
Volume 225, Issue 1, Pages 20-32

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.10.018

Keywords

turbulence; homogeneous turbulent shear; direct numerical simulations; pseudospectral algorithm; remeshing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Rogallo (1981) algorithm for simulating homogeneous turbulent shear flow solves the equations on a mesh that in physical space deforms with the mean flow. Eventually, when the mesh reaches a particular degree of deformation, the coordinate system must be remeshed. Remeshing introduces unavoidable numerical errors such as loss of turbulent kinetic energy and dissipation rate and is therefore not desirable. In this paper, we present a new algorithm for simulating homogeneous turbulent shear flow, based on a Fourier decomposition of the velocity field, that avoids the troublesome remeshing step. Equations for the Fourier amplitudes of three components of velocity are advanced in time; however, nonlinear terms are calculated on a stationary, orthogonal mesh in physical space, allowing traditional de-aliasing procedures to be used. The resulting spectral transforms involve a phase shift to account for the frame of reference change; consequently, the standard three-dimensional fast Fourier transforms (313 FFT) cannot be used. We have developed an algorithm that accomplishes the spectral transforms at a computational cost that still scales like O(N-3 InN)operations, where N is the number of grid points in each direction. A fully parallel version of the algorithm has been implemented to run on 2(p) processors, where p is a positive integer. Results over a broad range of the shear parameter, S*, demonstrate the advantages of avoiding the remeshing step. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available