3.9 Article

Predictors of weight loss in low-income mothers of young children

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages 1146-1154

Publisher

AMER DIETETIC ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2007.04.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To identify predictors of weight loss in a tri-ethnic population of low-income mothers. Design An 8-week dietary and physical activity program was tested. Demographic data were collected at baseline; anthropometric, dietary, physical activity, and psychosocial data were measured at baseline and week 8. Subjects/setting A convenience sample of 114 Hispanic, African-American, and white, low-income mothers with a body mass index >= 25 (calculated as kg/m(2)) participated in the intervention. Intervention Weight-loss classes that incorporated nutrition, physical activity, and behavior modification were administered for 8 weeks. Main outcome measures Anthropometry (body weight, weight loss). Statistical analyses performed Analysis of variance, chi(2) tests, and Spearman and Pearson correlations were used to test for associations between baseline and change data and total weight loss. Hierarchical regression was employed to assess the marginal importance of factors beyond socioeconomic influences. Results Correlates of weight loss included less satisfaction with appearance (r=0.24), greater percentage of energy from protein (r=-0.22), enhanced nutrition knowledge (r=-0.23), and higher scores for benefits of weight loss (r=-0.20) at baseline; and the change in healthful eating attitudes (r=-0.28) and social support (r=-0.21) at 8 weeks. The predictive models of baseline and change variables represented 11.4% and 13.8% of the variance, respectively. Conclusions Weight-management programs serving low-income mothers should provide techniques to enhance social support, attitudes toward healthful eating, benefits of weight loss, and nutrition knowledge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available