4.4 Review

One hit, two hits, three hits, more? Genomic changes in the development of retinoblastoma

Journal

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 617-634

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20457

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA118830-04, R01 CA118830] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The childhood eye cancer retinoblastoma is initiated by the loss of both alleles of the prototypic tumor suppressor gene, RBI. However, a large number of cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies have shown that these M1 and M2 mutational events-although necessary for initiation-are not the only genomic changes in retinoblastoma. Some of these subsequent changes, which we have termed M3 to Mn, are likely crucial for tumor progression not only in retinoblastoma but also in other cancers. Moreover, genes showing genomic change in cancer are more stable markers and, therefore, possible therapeutic targets than genes simply differentially expressed. In this review, we provide the first comprehensive summary of the genomic evidence implicating gain of 1q, 2p, 6p, and 13q, and loss of 16q in retinoblastoma oncogenesis, including karyotype, CGH, and microarray CGH data. We discuss the search for candidate oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes within these regions, including the candidates (KIF14, MDM4, MYCN, E2F3, DEK, CDH11, and others), plus associations between genomic changes and clinical parameters. We also review studies of other regions of the retinoblastoma genome, the epigenetic changes of aberrant methylation of MGMT, RASSFIA, CASP8, and MLH1, and the roles microRNAs might play in this cancer. Although many candidate genes have yet to be functionally validated in retinoblastoma, work in this field lays out a molecular cytogenetic pathway of retinoblastoma development. Candidate cancer genes carry diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications beyond retinoblastoma. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available