4.4 Article

Multisensory processing in unimodal neurons: Cross-modal subthreshold auditory effects in cat extrastriate visual cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 545-549

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00173.2007

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS39460] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multisensory processing in unimodal neurons: cross-modal subthreshold auditory effects in cat extrastriate visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 98:545-549, 2007. First published May 2, 2007; doi: 10.1152/jn.00173.2007. Historically, the study of multisensory processing has examined the function of the definitive neuron type, the bimodal neuron. These neurons are excited by inputs from more than one sensory modality, and when multisensory stimuli are present, they can integrate their responses in a predictable manner. However, recent studies have revealed that multisensory processing in the cortex is not restricted to bimodal neurons. The present investigation sought to examine the potential for multisensory processing in nonbimodal (unimodal) neurons in the retinotopically organized posterolateral lateral suprasylvian (PLLS) area of the cat. Standard extracellular recordings were used to measure responses of all neurons encountered to both separate-and combined-modality stimulation. Whereas bimodal neurons behaved as predicted, the surprising result was that 16% of unimodal visual neurons encountered were significantly facilitated by auditory stimuli. Because these unimodal visual neurons did not respond to an auditory stimulus presented alone but had their visual responses modulated by concurrent auditory stimulation, they represent a new form of multisensory neuron: the subthreshold multisensory neuron. These data also demonstrate that bimodal neurons can no longer be regarded as the exclusive basis for multisensory processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available