4.8 Article

A Highly Sensitive, Dual-Readout Assay Based on Gold Nanoparticles for Organophosphorus and Carbamate Pesticides

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 84, Issue 9, Pages 4185-4191

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac300545p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2009CB30001, 2011CB933201, 2012AA030608]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [90813032, 20890023, 21025520, 21105018]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [2122058]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-M15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report presents a highly sensitive, rhodamine B-covered gold nanoparticle (RB-AuNP) -based assay with dual readouts (colorimetric and fluorometric) for detecting organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides in complex solutions. The detection mechanism is based on the fact that these pesticides can inhibit the activity of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), thus preventing the generation of thiocholine (which turns the RB-AuNP solutions blue and unquenches the fluorescence of RB simultaneously). The color of the RB-AuNP solution remains red and the fluorescence of RB remains quenched. By use of this dual-readout assay, the lowest detectable concentrations for several kinds of pesticides including carbaryl, diazinon, malathion, and phorate were measured to be 0.1, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mu g/L, respectively, all of which are much lower than the maximum residue limits (MRL) as reported in the European Union pesticides database as well as those from the U.S. Department Agriculture (USDA). This assay allows detection of pesticides in real samples such as agricultural products and river water. The results in detecting pesticide residues collected from food samples via this method agree well with those from high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). This simple assay is therefore suitable for sensing pesticides in complex samples, especially, in combination with other portable platforms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available