4.5 Article

Physiological and biochemical markers of alveolar epithelial barrier dysfunction in perfused human lungs

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00256.2006

Keywords

alveolar epithelial fluid transport; acute lung injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; lung transplantation; biological markers; pulmonary edema; primary graft failure; air space fluid clearance

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL051856, R01 HL088440, R01 HL088440-01A1, R56 HL088440, R37 HL051856, K08 HL069900, R37 HL051856-14, HL-51856, HL-69900] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study air space fluid clearance ( AFC) under conditions that resemble the clinical setting of pulmonary edema in patients, we developed a new perfused human lung preparation. We measured AFC in 20 human lungs rejected for transplantation and determined the contribution of AFC to lung fluid balance. AFC was then compared with air space and perfusate levels of a biological marker of epithelial injury. The majority of human lungs rejected for transplant had intact basal ( 75%) and beta(2)-adrenergic agonist-stimulated ( 70%) AFC. For lungs with both basal and stimulated AFC, the basal AFC rate was 19 +/- 10%/ h, and the beta(2)-adrenergic- stimulated AFC rate was 43 +/- 13%/ h. Higher rates of AFC were associated with less lung weight gain ( Pearson coefficient -0.90, P < 0.0001). Air space and perfusate levels of the type I pneumocyte marker receptor for advanced glycation end products ( RAGE) were threefold and sixfold higher, respectively, in lungs without basal AFC compared with lungs with AFC ( P < 0.05). These data show that preserved AFC is a critical determinant of favorable lung fluid balance in the perfused human lung, raising the possibility that beta(2)-agonist therapy to increase edema fluid clearance may be of value for patients with acute lung injury and pulmonary edema. Also, although additional studies are needed, a biological marker of alveolar epithelial injury may be useful clinically in predicting preserved AFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available