4.6 Article

Contrasting effects of cyclosporine and rapamycin in de novo generation of alloantigen-specific regulatory T cells

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages 1722-1732

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01842.x

Keywords

antigen specific; cyclosporine; de novo generation; Foxp3; Rapamycin; regulatory T cells; tolerance

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI041521, AI41521-08] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 30843, R01 NS030843, R37 NS030843, R29 NS030843] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The outcome of T-cell-mediated responses, immunity or tolerance, critically depends on the balance of cytopathic versus regulatory T (T-reg) cells. In the creation of stable tolerance to MHC incompatible allografts, reducing the unusually large mass of donor-reactive cytopathic T effector (T-eff) cells via apoptosis is often required. Cyclosporine (CsA) blocks activation-induced cell death (AICD) of T-eff cells, and is detrimental to tolerance induction by costimulation blockade, whereas Rapamycin (RPM) preserves AICD, and augments the potential of costimulation blockade to create tolerance. While differences between CsA and RPM in influencing apoptosis of activated graft-destructive T-eff cells are apparent, their effects on graft-protective T-reg cells remain enigmatic. Moreover, it is unclear whether tolerizing regimens foster conversion of naive peripheral T cells into alloantigen-specific T-reg cells for graft protection. Here we show, using reporter mice for T-reg marker Foxp3, that RPM promotes de novo conversion of alloantigen-specific T-reg cells, whereas CsA completely inhibits this process. Upon transfer, in vivo converted T-reg cells potently suppress the rejection of donor but not third party skin grafts. Thus, the differential effects of RPM and CsA on T-eff and T-reg cells favor the use of RPM in shifting the balance of aggressive to protective type alloimmunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available