4.6 Article

Discrimination of bacteria and bacteriophages by Raman spectroscopy and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Journal

APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY
Volume 61, Issue 7, Pages 679-685

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1366/000370207781393217

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy; pathogen detection; bacteriophage; surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [P30 ES06694] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Detection of pathogenic organisms in the environment presents several challenges due to the high cost and long times typically required for identification and quantification. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based methods are often hindered by the presence of polymerase inhibiting compounds and so direct methods of quantification that do not require enrichment or amplification are being sought. This work presents an analysis of pathogen detection using Raman spectroscopy to identify and quantify microorganisms without drying. Confocal Raman measurements of the bacterium Escherichia coli and of two bacteriophages, MS2 and PRDI, were analyzed for characteristic peaks and to estimate detection limits using traditional Raman and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). MS2, PRD1, and E. coli produced differentiable Raman spectra with approximate detection limits for PRDI and E. coli of 10(9) pfu/mL and 10(6) cells/mL, respectively. These high detection concentration limits are partly due to the small sampling volume of the confocal system but translate to quantification of as little as 100 bacteriophages to generate a reliable spectral signal. SERS increased signal intensity 10(3) fold and presented peaks that were visible using 2-second acquisitions; however, peak locations and intensities were variable, as typical with SERS. These results demonstrate that Raman spectroscopy and SERS have potential as a pathogen monitoring platform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available