4.3 Article

Determination of epithelial Na+ channel subunit stoichiometry from single-channel conductances

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 55-70

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200609716

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK59659, R01 DK059659] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) is a multimeric membrane protein consisting of three subunits, alpha, beta, and gamma. The total number of subunits per functional channel complex has been described variously to follow either a tetrameric arrangement of 2 alpha:1 beta:1 gamma or a higher-ordered stoichiometry of 3 alpha:3 beta:3 gamma. Therefore, while it is clear that all three ENaC subunits are required for full channel activity, the number of the subunits required remains controversial. We used a new approach, based on single-channel measurements in Xenopus oocytes to address this issue. Individual mutations that alter single-channel conductance were made in pore-lining residues of ENaC alpha, beta, or gamma subunits. Recordings from patches in oocytes expressing a single species, wild type or mutant, of alpha, beta, and gamma showed a well-defined current transition amplitude with a single Gaussian distribution. When cRNAs for all three wild-type subunits were mixed with an equimolar amount of a mutant alpha-subunit (either S589D or S592T), amplitudes corresponding to pure wild-type or mutant conductances could be observed in the same patch, along with a third intermediate amplitude most likely arising from channels with at least one wild-type and at least 1 mutant alpha subunit. However, intermediate or hybrid conductances were not observed with coexpression of wild-type and mutant beta G529A or gamma G534E subunits. Our results support a tetrameric arrangement of ENaC subunits where 2 alpha 1 beta, and 1 gamma come together around central pore.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available