4.2 Article

The human immunomodulatory CD25+ B cell population belongs to the memory B cell pool

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 77-86

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.01946.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have shown that human CD20(+)25(+) B cells display immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this study was to investigate if CD25(+) B cells are found within the CD27 memory B cell population, and to analyse pattern of their cytokine production. B cells isolated from healthy subjects, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients were analysed regarding the frequency of CD25(+) B cells within certain B cell subsets. Purified CD25+ B cells from healthy subject were used in vitro to evaluate their production of immunomodulatory cytokines. In healthy subjects the majority (60%) of memory B cells (CD20(+)27(-)) also co-expressed CD25 while only 10-20% of the native B cells (CD20(+)27(-)) and plasmablasts (CD20-27(+)) expressed CD25. In RA and SLE patients, we found that 51% and 48%, respectively, co-expressed CD25 in the memory population, whereas only 11% and 9% co-expressed CD25 in the native B cell population. Phenotypic analysis of the CD20(+)25(+)27(+) and CD20(+)25(+)27(-) cells using CD10, CD24, CD38, CD45, CD71, CD80, CD86, CD95, CD138, BAFF-R, TACI, IgA, IgD, IgG and IgM showed that CD20(+)25(+)27(+) B cells preferentially represent highly activated, Ig class switched memory B cells. Cytokine profile analysis showed that CD25(+) B cells secreted significantly higher levels of IL-10 versus CD25(-) B cells. In contrast, TGF-beta 1 secretion was similar between the CD25(+) and CD25(-) sub-populations. In conclusion, CD20(+)25(+) B cells constitute a unique subpopulation preferentially occurring among CD20(+)27(+) memory B cells. We suggest that CD25 can be used as a marker for a memory B cell subset.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available