4.2 Article

Proteome analysis of microdissected formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue specimens

Journal

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 55, Issue 7, Pages 763-772

Publisher

HISTOCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1369/jhc.7A7177.2007

Keywords

proteomics; mass spectrometry; formalin-fixed; tissue; microdissection

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA103086, CA107988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR021862, RR021239] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeted proteomics research, based on the enrichment of disease-relevant proteins from isolated cell populations selected from high-quality tissue specimens, offers great potential for the identification of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biological markers for use in the clinical setting and during preclinical testing and clinical trials, as well as for the discovery and validation of new protein drug targets. Formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue collections, with attached clinical and outcome information, are invaluable resources for conducting retrospective protein biomarker investigations and performing translational studies of cancer and other diseases. Combined capillary isoelectric focusing/nano-reversed-phase liquid chromatography separations equipped with nano-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry are employed for the studies of proteins extracted from microdissected FFPE glioblastoma tissues using a heat-induced antigen retrieval (AR) technique. A total of 14,478 distinct peptides are identified, leading to the identification of 2733 non-redundant SwissProt protein entries. Eighty-three percent of identified FFPE tissue proteins overlap with those obtained from the pellet fraction of fresh-frozen tissue of the same patient. This large degree of protein overlapping is attributed to the application of detergent-based protein extraction in both the cell pellet preparation protocol and the AR technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available