4.8 Article

Highly Efficient Assay of Circulating Tumor Cells by Selective Sedimentation with a Density Gradient Medium and Microfiltration from Whole Blood

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 84, Issue 17, Pages 7400-7407

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac3011704

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isolation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by Size Density size exclusion can yield poor purity and low recovery rates, due Leukocytes amplification to large variations in size of CTCs, which may overlap with 9 leukocytes and render size-based filtration methods unreliable. This report presents a very sensitive, selective, fast, and novel method for isolation and detection of CTCs. Our assay platform consists of three steps: (i) capturing CTCs with anti-EpCAM conjugated microbeads, (ii) removal of unwanted hematologic cells (e.g., leukocytes, erythrocytes, etc.) by selective sedimentation of CTCs within a density gradient medium, and (iii) simple microfiltration to collect these cells. To demonstrate the efficacy of this assay, MCF-7 breast cancer cells (average diameter, mu pm) and DMS-79 small cell lung cancer cells (average diameter, 10 mu m) were used to model CTCs. We investigated the relative sedimentation rates for various cells and/or particles, such as CTCs conjugated with different types of microbeads, leukocytes, and erythrocytes, in order to maximize differences in the physical properties. We observed that greater than 99% of leukocytes in whole blood were effectively removed at an optimal centrifugal force, due to differences in their sedimentation rates, yielding a much purer sample compared to other filter-based methods. We also investigated not only the effect of filtration conditions on recovery rates and sample purity but also the sensitivity of our assay platform. Our results showed a near perfect recovery rate (similar to 99%) for MCF-7 cells and very high recovery rate (similar to 89%) for DMS-79 cells, with minimal amounts of leukocytes present.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available